well, think of it this way: say a message from you got mixed up and misinterpreted.
would you yourself simply be embarrassed, look the other way, and try denying it? or would you try to track down the information and the individuals involved, and confront them?
FROM: akame@cdc.org
why do you think people engage in these kinds of behaviors to begin with? it all starts with boredom.
and i was thinking along the lines of objects being found bent in odd or extreme ways or found with suspicious traces on them.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
that's usually how incidents like that turn out, anyway.
are you sure you'd want to attempt that with the devices working improperly? it's the direct approach, yes, but...well, i think what happened to my message with you serves as enough of a warning.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
i was trying to avoid being graphic.
and i'm...only speaking from eyewitness experience. my older comrades from home tended to do...reckless things when they got drunk.
ah... my hero tbh ;;
youre the one who was worried about fights breaking out
but at least that sounds a little more harmless
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
bored you say
i feel like there should still be some kind of line here
what are you even thinking about if youre talking about property damage
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
dont answer that question i dont need to know
pulls out piano
well, think of it this way: say a message from you got mixed up and misinterpreted.
would you yourself simply be embarrassed, look the other way, and try denying it? or would you try to track down the information and the individuals involved, and confront them?
FROM: akame@cdc.org
why do you think people engage in these kinds of behaviors to begin with? it all starts with boredom.
and i was thinking along the lines of objects being found bent in odd or extreme ways or found with suspicious traces on them.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
that's usually how incidents like that turn out, anyway.
[is she speaking from hearsay?
is she speaking from...personal experience?
draw your own conclusions.]
waits eagerly
depends
isnt it easier to just message them and explain in the first place?? when u can explain it, anyway
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
you know i really meant it when i said i didnt need to know
you sound surprisingly knowledgeable about this????
sings barry manilow
are you sure you'd want to attempt that with the devices working improperly? it's the direct approach, yes, but...well, i think what happened to my message with you serves as enough of a warning.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
i was trying to avoid being graphic.
and i'm...only speaking from eyewitness experience. my older comrades from home tended to do...reckless things when they got drunk.
s w o o n s
theyre bound to come back up sometimes
but you have a point
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
uh-huh.
so no experience what so ever?
winks
FROM: akame@cdc.org
none...in that kind of regard, anyhow.
...did i strike you as the opposite?
[the ( U N S U R E ) is strong in this one.]
faints
not exactly
you just told me a lot about it cant blame me for assuming things
[ aka he's not fishing for anything this is all just slightly amusing really ]
no subject
...is my knowledge a bad thing, then?
i was just offering my insight, really.
[still doesn't make it any less awkward.
because this suddenly got really, really awkward. not so much for him now, but for her.]
no subject
not really? told you, i was just assuming things [ but no sorrys here, folks. ]
anyway thanks
no subject
ah...right. i...should have been clearer.
i'm...glad i could provide you with knowledge, however.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
i think it'll be best if we never speak of this again, should we meet in person.
[what happens in misfires stays in inboxes: a life lesson.]
no subject
i'll try to remember that
no subject
i'd appreciate that.
sorry for getting you mixed up in this. till next time, i suppose.