well, think of it this way: say a message from you got mixed up and misinterpreted.
would you yourself simply be embarrassed, look the other way, and try denying it? or would you try to track down the information and the individuals involved, and confront them?
FROM: akame@cdc.org
why do you think people engage in these kinds of behaviors to begin with? it all starts with boredom.
and i was thinking along the lines of objects being found bent in odd or extreme ways or found with suspicious traces on them.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
that's usually how incidents like that turn out, anyway.
are you sure you'd want to attempt that with the devices working improperly? it's the direct approach, yes, but...well, i think what happened to my message with you serves as enough of a warning.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
i was trying to avoid being graphic.
and i'm...only speaking from eyewitness experience. my older comrades from home tended to do...reckless things when they got drunk.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
i dream a dream smth smth idk
you sound really good willed about this
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
all i need to know, sounds like a waste of food
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
????????????????????????????
arceus the systems are a mess
don't stop belieeeevin'
a lot of people are friendly with one another here. it'd be a shame to see them have fallouts over otherwise harmless---for the most part---messages.
['for the most part' being the keywords in point here.]
FROM: akame@cdc.org
especially if the food's been used on inappropriate parts of the body.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
i'm certain the replacement costs for whatever items may have been damaged in the heat of their moment are steep.
my song game is too weak atm, apologies 8(
harmless is ... i dunno
the intent wasnt there but they could still hurt
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
yeah i didnt need to know taht
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
also didnt need to know that
why???????
it's ok i'll serenade you
at worst, people could just be unable to look each other in the eye for a while.
either way, it should only be temporary.
but i guess that could depend on people's sensibilities.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
people do strange things when they're bored. i suppose the being isolated and quarantined got to them.
i'm just mildly concerned about what actions the instructors may take in response to the property damage.
ah... my hero tbh ;;
youre the one who was worried about fights breaking out
but at least that sounds a little more harmless
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
bored you say
i feel like there should still be some kind of line here
what are you even thinking about if youre talking about property damage
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
dont answer that question i dont need to know
pulls out piano
well, think of it this way: say a message from you got mixed up and misinterpreted.
would you yourself simply be embarrassed, look the other way, and try denying it? or would you try to track down the information and the individuals involved, and confront them?
FROM: akame@cdc.org
why do you think people engage in these kinds of behaviors to begin with? it all starts with boredom.
and i was thinking along the lines of objects being found bent in odd or extreme ways or found with suspicious traces on them.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
that's usually how incidents like that turn out, anyway.
[is she speaking from hearsay?
is she speaking from...personal experience?
draw your own conclusions.]
waits eagerly
depends
isnt it easier to just message them and explain in the first place?? when u can explain it, anyway
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
you know i really meant it when i said i didnt need to know
you sound surprisingly knowledgeable about this????
sings barry manilow
are you sure you'd want to attempt that with the devices working improperly? it's the direct approach, yes, but...well, i think what happened to my message with you serves as enough of a warning.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
i was trying to avoid being graphic.
and i'm...only speaking from eyewitness experience. my older comrades from home tended to do...reckless things when they got drunk.
s w o o n s
theyre bound to come back up sometimes
but you have a point
FROM: oak.green@cdc.org
uh-huh.
so no experience what so ever?
winks
FROM: akame@cdc.org
none...in that kind of regard, anyhow.
...did i strike you as the opposite?
[the ( U N S U R E ) is strong in this one.]
faints
not exactly
you just told me a lot about it cant blame me for assuming things
[ aka he's not fishing for anything this is all just slightly amusing really ]
no subject
...is my knowledge a bad thing, then?
i was just offering my insight, really.
[still doesn't make it any less awkward.
because this suddenly got really, really awkward. not so much for him now, but for her.]
no subject
not really? told you, i was just assuming things [ but no sorrys here, folks. ]
anyway thanks
no subject
ah...right. i...should have been clearer.
i'm...glad i could provide you with knowledge, however.
FROM: akame@cdc.org
i think it'll be best if we never speak of this again, should we meet in person.
[what happens in misfires stays in inboxes: a life lesson.]
no subject
i'll try to remember that
no subject
i'd appreciate that.
sorry for getting you mixed up in this. till next time, i suppose.